PYLE v. PYLE

No. 92-2035.

617 So.2d 1098 (1993)

Douglas J. PYLE, Appellant, v. Rosalia PYLE, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

April 20, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ira M. Witlin, Miami, for appellant.

Becker & Poliakoff, Evelyn M. Merchant and Darin Engelhartt, Ft. Lauderdale, for appellee.

Before BASKIN, FERGUSON and COPE, JJ.


PER CURIAM.

We agree with the appellant that the trial court, in fashioning an award of alimony, should not have relied on an adulterous act of the husband which was committed eighteen years prior to the filing of the dissolution petition, which had no economic consequences. The case is remanded for a determination based on the criteria enumerated in section 61.08, Florida Statutes (1991). See Noah v. Noah, 491 So.2d 1124

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases