1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 993 F.2d
  5. 993 F.2d 710 (1993)
 

TAYLOR v. REGENTS OF UNIV. OF CAL.

No. 92-16022.

993 F.2d 710 (1993)

Michael E. TAYLOR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The REGENTS OF the UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, Clara Sue Kidwell, Daniel F. Melia, Joseph Cerny, Lucien Lecam, Rudolph Beran, Nora B. Lee, Eric L. Lehmann, Jim Pitman, and David Brillinger, Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided May 21, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael E. Taylor, pro se.

James E. Holst, Christine Helwick, Eric K. Behrens, Office of Gen. Counsel, University of California, Oakland, CA, for defendants-appellees.

Before: HUG, WIGGINS and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Michael Taylor appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his civil rights action against the Regents of the University of California and various University employees. The district court determined that the statute of limitations had run on Taylor's 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981, 1983, 1985, and 2000d claims. A ruling on the appropriate statute of limitations is a question of law reviewed de novo. Felton v. Unisource Corp., 940...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases