HEMPHILL v. WMATA

No. 91-7112.

982 F.2d 572 (1993)

Patricia Ann HEMPHILL, Appellant, v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY, Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Decided January 15, 1993.

As Amended January 15, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas Fortune Fay was on the brief, for appellant.

Bruce P. Heppen, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, with whom Robert L. Polk, Gen. Counsel, and Gerard J. Stief, Associate Gen. Counsel, Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority were on the brief, for appellee.

Before: RUTH BADER GINSBURG, SILBERMAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.


PER CURIAM:

It is the judgment of this court, in which all three judges concur, that the judgment of the district court be vacated and the case remanded for a new trial. As explained in the opinions of the three judges that follow, the "claims-minded-plaintiff" instruction given by the magistrate judge was improper.

RUTH BADER GINSBURG, Circuit Judge, concurring in the judgment:

Plaintiff-appellant in this vehicle accident case presents a sole issue...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases