1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. So.2d
  4. 631 So.2d
  5. 631 So.2d 915 (1993)
 

MEEKS v. BUDCO GROUP, INC.

1921700.

631 So.2d 915 (1993)

Donald MEEKS v. BUDCO GROUP, INC., et al.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

December 30, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James J. Dailey of Killion & Vollmer, P.C., Mobile, for appellant.

Benjamen T. Rowe and David L. Kane, Mobile, for appellees.

HOUSTON, Justice.

Donald Meeks appeals from a summary judgment in favor of Budco Group, Inc., in which the trial court ruled that Budco, including all its divisions, was Meeks's "employer" for purposes of the Workers' Compensation Act, Ala.Code 1975, § 25-5-1 et seq., and therefore could assert the exclusivity provisions of the Act, §§ 25-5-52, -53 as a defense to Meeks's action seeking damages based on an...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases