LUTTRELL v. ROGER HOLLER CHEVROLET

No. 92-786.

625 So.2d 921 (1993)

Robert LUTTRELL, Appellant, v. ROGER HOLLER CHEVROLET, and Crum & Forster, Appellees.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

October 15, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bill McCabe, Longwood, for appellant.

Mark S. Spangler, Rissman, Weisberg, Barrett & Hurt, P.A., Orlando, for appellees.


ERVIN, Judge.

Claimant appeals from a workers' compensation order denying his claim for indemnity benefits from the date of maximum medical improvement (MMI), incidental costs, penalties, interest, and attorney's fees, arguing that in denying the claim, the judge of compensation claims (JCC) erroneously relied upon the medical testimony of one of claimant's treating physicians who had opined that claimant's industrial accident of September 28, 1989 was only a temporary...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases