STATE v. CHASE

10-86-03551B, 10-86-03551X, 10-86-03551; CA A66149 (Control), CA A66233, CA A66370.

851 P.2d 637 (1993)

120 Or. App. 523

STATE of Oregon, Respondent, v. Norman Keith CHASE, Appellant. STATE of Oregon, Respondent, v. Norman Keith CHASE, Appellant. STATE of Oregon, Plaintiff, v. Norman Keith CHASE, Appellant, and Kenneth N. Feldman, F. Douglass Harcleroad, Lane County District Attorney's Office and Mary Doe, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided May 19, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Irene B. Taylor, Salem, argued the cause for appellant. With her on the brief was Sally L. Avera, Public Defender, Salem.

Timothy A. Sylwester, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondents. On the brief were Charles S. Crookham, Atty. Gen., Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., and Carol J. Fredrick, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem.

Before WARREN, P.J., and RIGGS and EDMONDS, JJ.


PER CURIAM.

In CA A66149 and CA A66233, defendant appeals from an order that revoked his probation and executed a previously suspended sentence. ORS 138.040; ORS 138.-053(1)(f), (3). He argues that his probation was void and that the trial court erred in revoking it. He also argues that the court failed to advise him of his right to counsel in the probation revocation proceeding. The state asks us to dismiss the appeal as moot, because defendant has served the executed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases