PER CURIAM.
The respondent, A.G., appeals from his adjudication of delinquency for burglary and grand theft. The adjudication of delinquency for burglary is affirmed since the evidence established that A.G. actually participated. However, A.G.'s adjudication of delinquency for grand theft must be reduced to petit theft since the State failed to offer evidence as to the value of the stolen property. See L.C. v. State,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.