CARLING v. SAIF CORP.

89-08425, CA A70736.

851 P.2d 624 (1993)

119 Or. App. 466

In the Matter of the Compensation of James A. Carling, Claimant. James A. CARLING, Petitioner, v. SAIF CORPORATION and Martin Construction Co., Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided April 21, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Eileen G. Simpson, Eugene, argued the cause for petitioner. With her on the brief was Peter O. Hansen, Portland.

Julie K. Bolt, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondents. With her on the brief was Charles S. Crookham, Atty. Gen., and Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., Salem.

Before RICHARDSON, C.J., and DEITS and DURHAM, JJ.


DURHAM, Judge.

Claimant seeks review of an order of the Worker's Compensation Board upholding the denial of his claim on the basis of various psychological conditions. We review the Board's order for errors of law,1 ORS 656.298(6); ORS 183.482(8), and reverse.

Claimant has a history of psychological problems. Following an accepted occupational injury in 1988, he filed a claim for various psychological conditions, including post...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases