U.S. v. HITCHCOCK

Nos. 91-10388, 91-10400.

992 F.2d 236 (1993)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael L. HITCHCOCK, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert B. GREENSLADE, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Memorandum Filed February 11, 1993.

Decided April 28, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Karen L. Snell, Asst. Federal Public Defender, San Francisco, CA, for defendants-appellants.

Susan B. Gray, Eric R. Havian, Asst. U.S. Attys., San Francisco, CA, for plaintiff-appellee.

Before FLETCHER, POOLE and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges.


ORDER AND OPINION

ORDER

The government's request for publication is granted. The memorandum disposition filed February 11, 1993 is redesignated a per curiam opinion.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

Hitchcock and Greenslade were separately charged with failure to file tax returns. The district court refused to appoint counsel without a showing of financial need. It also refused to prevent the prosecution from using the information they submitted...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases