WATSON v. INGRAM

No. 29887-9-I.

70 Wn. App. 45 (1993)

851 P.2d 761

WAYNE WATSON, Appellant, v. JAMES INGRAM, Respondent.

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division One.

May 24, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William G. Knudsen, for appellant.

Ernest A. Bentley and Bentley, Uhrig & Gallery, for respondent.


AGID, J.

Wayne Watson appeals the findings of fact, conclusions of law, and judgment of $15,000 entered against him in favor of James Ingram. Watson argues that the trial court erred by concluding that the liquidated damages clause in the parties' purchase and sale agreement was valid and enforceable and that Ingram breached an implied duty of good faith by refusing to extend the scheduled closing date of the sale. We affirm.

On August 6, 1990, Wayne Watson...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases