TATZLER v. MAIN UROLOGY ASSOCS.


197 A.D.2d 923 (1993)

604 N.Y.S.2d 864

Angela Tatzler, Individually and as Parent and Natural Guardian of Welf Tatzler, an Infant, Respondent, v. Main Urology Associates, P. C., et al., Appellants

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Fourth Department.

October 1, 1993


Order unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum:

Supreme Court, in its order denying defendants' cross motion, stated that "defendants may renew their cross motion to compel the examination before trial of plaintiffs upon a demonstration by defendants that the discovery is, on the whole, insufficient to the defendants because of the lack of such examination, to properly apprise them of the details of the action against them".

Under those circumstances...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases