1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 826 F.Supp.
  5. 826 F.Supp. 266 (1993)
 

NEAL v. HONEYWELL, INC.

No. 93 C 1143.

826 F.Supp. 266 (1993)

Judith A. NEAL, Plaintiff, v. HONEYWELL, INC., a corporation, and Alliant Techsystems Inc., a corporation, Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, E.D.

Opinion Certifying Interlocutory Appeal July 9, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William J. Holloway, Michael John Leech, William G. Swindal, Robert Hill Smeltzer, Hinshaw & Culbertson, Chicago, IL, for plaintiff.

James A. Burstein, Paul E. Freehling, Kristin E. Michaels, Pope, Ballard, Shepard & Fowle, Ltd., Chicago, IL, for defendants.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

PLUNKETT, District Judge.

This matter is before us on the Defendants' Motion to Dismiss the Complaint. For the reasons stated below, the motion is denied.

Facts

Plaintiff Judith Neal alleges that in February 1987 she discovered that her employer, Honeywell, was falsifying ballistics test data and delivering defective ammunition to the United States Army. When she discovered this conduct, she reported...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases