Judgment unanimously affirmed without costs.
Memorandum:
Supreme Court properly dismissed petitioner's CPLR article 78 proceeding, which sought to annul respondents' determination denying petitioner's application for a use variance. Petitioner failed to establish that no reasonable return could be achieved under a permitted use of the property and thus failed to meet the requisite showing of unnecessary hardship (Matter of Village Bd. v Jarrold,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.