Judgment unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum:
We reject defendant's contention that Supreme Court erred in admitting evidence regarding certain words contained in defendant's statement that were legible but had been crossed out with a typewriter at defendant's direction. Contrary to defendant's argument, those words were not outside the scope of the People's CPL 710.30 notice (cf., People v Ludolph,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.