1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. So.2d
  4. 630 So.2d
  5. 630 So.2d 395 (1993)
 

FORD NEW HOLLAND v. PROCTOR-RUSSELL TRACTOR

1920543.

630 So.2d 395 (1993)

FORD NEW HOLLAND, INC. v. PROCTOR-RUSSELL TRACTOR COMPANY, INC.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

Rehearing Denied December 10, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard A. Ball, Jr. of Ball, Ball, Matthews & Novak, P.A., Montgomery, and John F. Porter III of Livingston, Porter & Paulk, P.C., Scottsboro, for appellant.

W.W. Haralson, Scottsboro, for appellee.

INGRAM, Justice.

Proctor-Russell Tractor Company, Inc. (hereinafter "Proctor-Russell"), sued Ford New Holland, Inc. (hereinafter "Ford"), alleging fraud and breach of contract. A jury returned a verdict in favor of Proctor-Russell on the fraud claim and awarded it $65,000 in compensatory damages and $200,000 in punitive damages. Ford appeals, arguing, inter alia, that the evidence presented by Proctor-Russell was insufficient to support the jury's verdict in its favor...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases