Ordered that the order of disposition is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The appellant contends that the Family Court erred in crediting the hearing testimony of a police officer regarding his observation of a bulge in the appellant's waistband. However, as we frequently have noted, "[t]he determination of the hearing court, with its advantage of having seen and heard the witnesses, must be accorded great weight (see, People v Prochilo,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.