ROGERS v. STELL

No. D-2348.

835 S.W.2d 100 (1992)

Belinda Moore ROGERS, Petitioner, v. Robert STELL and Mary Stell, Respondents.

Supreme Court of Texas.

July 1, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

G. David Westfall, Dallas, for petitioner.

James Lee Williams, Dallas, for respondents.


PER CURIAM.

We hold that an undisclosed individual party witness may testify at trial where the party did not respond to or supplement her response to an interrogatory seeking persons expected to be called at trial, but properly identified herself as a person with knowledge of relevant facts.

After a traffic accident, Robert and Mary Stell sued Belinda Rogers for property damage to their car. Among the twentythree interrogatories Rogers answered were the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases