1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 803 F.Supp.
  5. 803 F.Supp. 115 (1992)
 

U.S. EX REL. BURCH v. PIQUA ENGINEERING, INC.

No. C-1-90-745.

803 F.Supp. 115 (1992)

UNITED STATES, ex rel. Barbara BURCH, et al., Plaintiffs, v. PIQUA ENGINEERING, INC., Defendant.

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, W.D.

June 18, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ann Louise Lugbill, James Burdette Helmer, Jr., Helmer, Lugbill & Whitman Co., Cincinnati, Ohio, for plaintiffs Barbara K. Burch, Joan R. Harmon and Lowell A. Kissinger.

John William Beatty, Dinsmore & Shohl, Cincinnati, Ohio, for defendant Piqua Engineering.

Michael Davidson, Senate Legal Counsel, Washington, D.C., for amicus curiae U.S. Senate.

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS

SPIEGEL, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on the Defendant's motion to dismiss (doc. 19), the memorandum of amicus curiae United States Senate in support of the constitutionality of the False Claims Act (doc. 22), the Plaintiffs' response (doc. 23), and the Defendant's reply (doc. 25).1

BACKGROUND

Plaintiffs Barbara K. Burch, Joan R. Harmon, and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases