1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wn.
  4. 63 Wn.
  5. 63 Wn. App. 733 (1992)
 

QUINN v. CONNELLY

No. 28360-0-I.

63 Wn. App. 733 (1992)

821 P.2d 1256

JOHN RICHARD QUINN, ET AL, Appellants, v. JAMES PAUL CONNELLY, ET AL, Respondents.

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division One.

January 13, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dustin D. Deissner, W. Russell VanCamp, and VanCamp & Bennion (Charles M. McDonald, Lynn W. Malone, and McDonald, Harmone & Malone, of counsel), for appellants.

William A. Helsell, Bradley H. Bagshaw, and Helsell, Fetterman, Martin, Todd & Hokanson, for respondents.

BAKER, J.

Dr. John R. and Patricia L. Quinn appeal the dismissal on summary judgment of their action for legal malpractice, alleging the trial court erred in ruling their claim was barred by the statute of limitations. Respondents James Paul Connelly and his law firm, Winston & Cashatt, cross-appeal, alleging the trial court erred in refusing to dismiss the Quinns' Consumer Protection Act claim for the return of allegedly...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases