1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 255 N.J.
  5. 255 N.J. Super. 524 (1992)
 

MARTIN v. PRUDENTIAL INS. CO.

255 N.J. Super. 524 (1992)

605 A.2d 762

ALICE MARTIN, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided April 20, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lars S. Hyberg argued the cause for appellant (McAllister, Westmoreland, Vesper & Schwartz, attorneys).

Randi S. Greenberg argued the cause for respondent (Robert A. Auerbach, attorney).

Before Judges KING, DREIER and GRUCCIO.

The opinion of the court was delivered by KING, P.J.A.D.

This case involves the right of a Pennsylvania resident, injured in a New Jersey accident while a passenger in a vehicle insured and registered in New Jersey, to recover medical benefits under her host's PIP coverage. We reject her host's carrier's argument that acceptance of the maximum benefits, $10,000, under plaintiff's own Pennsylvania family policy defeats her PIP claim under New Jersey's No-Fault Law...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases