STATE v. MORDICA

No. 91-1877-CR.

168 Wis.2d 593 (1992)

484 N.W.2d 352

STATE of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Rogers Lee MORDICA, Defendant-Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.

Decided April 1, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

On behalf of the defendant-appellant, the cause was submitted on the briefs of Robert N. Meyeroff, of Milwaukee.

On behalf of the plaintiff-respondent, the cause was submitted on the brief of James E. Doyle, attorney general, and Stephen W. Kleinmaier, assistant attorney general.

Before Nettesheim, P.J., Anderson and Snyder, JJ.


NETTESHEIM, P.J.

Rogers Lee Mordica appeals from a judgment of conviction for possession of heroin with intent to deliver, contrary to sec. 161.41(1m)(d)2, Stats., and a judgment of conviction for possession of cocaine with intent to deliver, contrary to sec. 161.41(1m) (c)2. The principal issue concerns limitations the trial court placed on Mordica's trial testimony which sought to explain why Mordica made certain incrimination statements to the police during the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases