ANASTASIO v. RUSSELL


187 A.D.2d 548 (1992)

Armand Anastasio et al., Respondents, v. Charmack A. Russell, Respondent, Ross S. Greenberg, Appellant, et al., Defendant. (Action No. 1.) Joseph Cozza et al., Respondents, v. County of Suffolk et al., Defendants, Ross Greenberg, Appellant, and Russell Charmack, Respondent. (Action No. 2.)

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

November 16, 1992


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs payable to the defendant-respondent.

The appellant failed to demonstrate that the granting of the motion would result in any prejudice to him (see, Bernstein v Spatola, 122 A.D.2d 97). Moreover, the admission made by the appellant, in his examination before trial, that he had "stole[n] the car" established the merit of the movant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases