Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant asserts that his right to counsel was violated when, upon being returned to the State on a bench warrant issued in connection with a prior robbery case upon which he was ultimately sentenced in absentia while represented by counsel, law enforcement officials questioned him and obtained both oral and videotaped statements concerning the instant crimes. As the Court of Appeals in People v Harris (
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.