STATE, EX REL. HODGES, v. TAFT

No. 92-16.

64 Ohio St.3d 1 (1992)

THE STATE, EX REL. HODGES ET AL., v. TAFT, SECY, OF STATE, ET AL.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided May 13, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Vorys, Sater, Seymour & Pease, Sandra J. Anderson and Jacob E. Davis II, for relators.

Lee I. Fisher, Attorney General, Cherry L. Poteet and Andrew I. Sutter, for respondent Bob Taft.

Lee I. Fisher, Attorney General, and Theresa Rittinger Schaefer, for respondents General Assembly, Martha L. Butler and Dean Johnson.

Donald J. McTigue, urging denial of the writ for amicus curiae, Ohio Citizen Action.


GRADY, J.

The complaint presents three issues for consideration:

(1) Whether respondent Taft was required to disqualify those petitions and part-petitions without an executed circulator's compensation statement and/or required to advise the boards of elections to do so;

(2) Whether respondent Taft was required to withhold transmission of the proposed law to the General Assembly until the beginning of the next biennium in January 1993; and

...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases