PEOPLE v. SCHULTZ


187 A.D.2d 466 (1992)

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. John C. Schultz, Appellant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

November 2, 1992


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We disagree with the defendant's contention that his station-house statement, given after he waived his Miranda rights (see, Miranda v Arizona, 384 U.S. 436), was tainted by the illegality of a prior inadmissible statement. The defendant was not subjected to such continuous interrogation as to render the Miranda warnings ineffective...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases