There is no merit to defendant's contention that his 1976 conviction was actually a youthful offender adjudication. Defendant did not challenge the 1976 conviction on that basis in 1982, when he was sentenced as a second felony offender (CPL 400.15 [8]); the minutes of the 1976 sentencing proceeding reflect that defendant was sentenced as a felon; and the certified record that was introduced at the hearing reflects that the 1976 judgment was based on a felony conviction....
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
