The testimony elicited by the People concerning the inability of the witnesses to identify defendant at trial substantially complied with CPL 60.25 (1) (a) (iii), and the inferential testimony of the officers, as noted by defendant, irresistibly leads to the conclusion that a prior identification was made. The challenged testimony, therefore, was properly admitted as evidence...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.