We agree with the IAS Court that defendants failed to establish that the convenience of non-party witnesses would be promoted by the proposed change of venue (CPLR 510 [3]), nor did defendants furnish any statement identifying the non-party witnesses expected to be called at trial and specifying the nature of their testimony (see, Clark v New Rochelle Hosp. Med. Ctr.,
We have considered all other claims...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.