1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Pa.
  4. 532 Pa.
  5. 532 Pa. 56 (1992)
 

DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. GEISLER

532 Pa. 56 (1992)

614 A.2d 1134

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Petitioner, v. Michael S. GEISLER, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Decided October 8, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Norma Chase, Pittsburgh, for respondent.

Samuel F. Napoli, Pittsburgh, for Asst. Disciplinary Counsel.

OPINION OF THE COURT

ZAPPALA, Justice.

This matter comes before the Court on a Rule to Show Cause why Michael S. Geisler should not be disbarred. The Rule was issued on the Court's own motion, pursuant to Pennsylvania Rule of Disciplinary Enforcement 208(e)(3), after the Disciplinary Board had submitted a Report and Recommendation that Geisler be suspended from the practice of law for a period of three months. On March 4, 1988, a Petition for Discipline...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases