Summary judgment was appropriately denied in this case concerning property damage allegedly caused by water bursting out of a pipe, because questions of fact exist, including whether the "drip" in the pipe, known to defendant prior to the letting to plaintiff, was a "defect", and if so, whether it was a latent defect. Indeed, defendants concede that when
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
