The court did not abuse its discretion in ordering restrictive placement herein based upon the needs and best interests of appellant, his record and background, the specifics of the offense, the age and physical condition of victim, and the community's need for protection (Family Ct Act § 352.2 [2] [a]; § 353.5). Three prior less restrictive placements had failed to stem appellant's persistent history of drug trafficking. Further, the present offense was committed...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
