We find merit in the contention that the Hearing Officer erred in denying petitioner's request to call medical personnel who had treated the inmate allegedly assaulted by petitioner so that petitioner could elicit testimony as to the possibility that the injuries sustained were accidental. Given the failure of the only medical professional to testify at the hearing to conclusively rule out accidental injury, such testimony was clearly relevant. The testimony was also not...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.