Respondent was not arbitrary and capricious in denying petitioner's application for public housing on the basis of petitioner's admission that he had been recently evicted from his apartment in Indiana for nonpayment of rent and was behind in his rent for his current apartment. Indeed, in furtherance of Federal and State policy to remedy the shortage of decent housing for low-income families (42 USC § 1437; Public Housing Law § 2), respondent is required by law...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
