1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 260 N.J.
  5. 260 N.J. Super. 227 (1992)
 

STATE v. MODELL

260 N.J. Super. 227 (1992)

615 A.2d 1264

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. STUART MODELL, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided November 4, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Larry Blumenstyk argued the cause for appellant (Larry Blumenstyk and David Wendel, on the brief; Catherine Langlois, on the reply brief).

Mark Paul Cronin, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent (Robert J. Del Tufo, Attorney General, attorney; Mark Paul Cronin, of counsel and on the brief).

Before Judges J.H. COLEMAN, SHEBELL and CONLEY.

The opinion of the court was delivered by SHEBELL, J.A.D.

Defendant, Stuart Modell, appeals from his jury convictions on two counts of third-degree theft by failure to make required disposition of property received (counts one and four) (N.J.S.A. 2C:20-9); three counts of second degree theft by failure to make required disposition of property received (counts six, eight and ten) (N.J.S.A. 2C:20-9); two counts of third-degree misapplication of entrusted...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases