Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.
The defendant contends that the trial court erred in its Sandoval ruling by permitting him, in the event he testified, to be cross-examined regarding a prior felony conviction for weapons possession. He maintains that inquiry into the prior conviction should have been precluded as unduly prejudicial because of the similarity between that crime and the offenses with which he was charged in this case. The contention is...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
