KRILL v. AZIZ


186 A.D.2d 81 (1992)

George Krill et al., Respondents, v. Mustapha Aziz, Appellant, et al., Defendant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

September 24, 1992


At the time of the motion leading to the determination on appeal, the only genuine issue of fact was whether or not defendant's signature on a promissory note was forged. In order to raise a question of fact on the issue defendant was required to produce evidentiary facts in support of his claim (see, State Bank v McAuliffe, 97 A.D.2d 607, 608, appeal dismissed 61 N.Y.2d 758...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases