LEASEFIRST v. HARTFORD REXALL DRUGS

No. 91-2446-FT.

168 Wis.2d 83 (1992)

483 N.W.2d 585

LEASEFIRST, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HARTFORD REXALL DRUGS, INC., and Jack D. Reinholz, Defendants-Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.

Decided February 26, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

On behalf of plaintiff-appellant the cause was submitted on the briefs of Roland L. Pieper of Schuman & Pieper of Glendale.

On behalf of defendants-respondents the cause was submitted on the brief of James W. Mohr, Jr. of Mohr, Anderson & McClurg, S.C. of Hartford.

Before Nettesheim, P.J., Brown and Anderson, JJ.


ANDERSON, J.

Leasefirst appeals from an order granting relief from a Michigan court judgment docketed in Wisconsin pursuant to sec. 806.24, Stats. Leasefirst argues that the Michigan judgment is not void because the Michigan court had personal jurisdiction over Jack D. Reinholz and Hartford Rexall Drugs, Inc. (Reinholz collectively) due to an enforceable forum selection clause. We conclude that the clause is unconscionable, and we affirm the order granting relief...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases