ASS'N OF SURROGATES & SUPREME CT. RPTRS. WITHIN CITY OF N.Y. v. STATE OF NEW YORK

No. 1039, Docket 91-7936.

969 F.2d 1416 (1992)

ASSOCIATION OF SURROGATES AND SUPREME COURT REPORTERS WITHIN THE CITY OF NEW YORK, Mary O'Leary, President; Citywide Association of Law Assistants, Barbara Brown, President; Court Attorneys Association of the City of New York, Robert Mulhall, President; Court Officers Benevolent Association of Nassau Co., Jeffrey Pollac, President; District Council 37, American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees & Local 1070, Paul Shelkin, President; Local 704, Service Employees International Union, John Walsh, President; New York State Supreme Court Officers Association, ILA, Local 2013, AFL-CIO, John McKillop, President; Ninth Judicial District Court Employees Association, Martin Sharp, President; Suffolk County Court Employees Association, Inc., Thomas F. McGuinness, President; the Communications Workers of America, AFL-CIO, Local 1180, Arthur Cheliotes, President; Civil Service Forum, Local 200, SEIU, Salvatore Cangiarella, President; Janet Foster; Susan Glasbrenner; Michael Sullivan; David Richman; Greg Snigor; James DiNapoli; William Rosario; Abel Peltro; George F. Berhorn; Lisa Rosenzwig; and Michael Smith, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. STATE OF NEW YORK; Edward V. Regan, as Comptroller of the State of New York; and Robert Abrams, as Attorney General of the State of New York, Defendants-Appellants, and Matthew T. Crosson, as Chief Administrator of the Unified Court System and the State of New York Unified Court System, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Decided July 20, 1992.


ON PETITION FOR REHEARING

WINTER, Circuit Judge:

Matthew T. Crosson, Chief Administrator of the New York court system, petitions for rehearing from the panel decision vacating Judge Patterson's order directing restitution to be paid from the surplus in the Judiciary Budget for Fiscal Year ("FY") 1990-91. Association of Surrogates v. New York, 966 F.2d 75 (2d Cir. 1992). Familiarity with that decision is assumed.<...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases