PEOPLE v. CHAUDHRY


186 A.D.2d 48 (1992)

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Saleem Chaudhry, Appellant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

September 17, 1992


The prosecutor was not required to charge the Grand Jury with respect to circumstantial evidence since the evidence offered was both direct and circumstantial (People v Morales, 183 A.D.2d 570).

The trial court's annotation of the verdict sheet, indicating factual distinctions among the various, otherwise identical counts does not constitute error under People v Nimmons (72 N.Y.2d 830

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases