1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 964 F.2d
  5. 964 F.2d 1369 (1992)
 

MINDEK v. RIGATTI

No. 92-3040.

964 F.2d 1369 (1992)

Ronald L. MINDEK; Ben Mindek, Appellants v. Thomas G. RIGATTI; Harold Purdy; Mark Dorsey; Samuel J. Secreet; Mark Joyce; Michael Bowen; Michael Phillips; Lyman Bellaire, Mayor of McDonald Borough, Washington County, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania; Borough of McDonald, Washington County, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania; William Tohey; Bryan Barbour; Cecil Township, Washington County, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania; James Garove; James Horvath; Chartiers Township, Washington County, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania; June Lilley, District Justice, Managerial District 27-3-8 of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania; Paul Pozonsky, District Justice, Magisterial District 27-3-6 of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania; John C. Pettit, District Attorney, Washington County, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania; Michael Fagella, Assistant District Attorney, Washington County, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania; Thomas D. Cladden, Judge, Washington County, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Decided May 29, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ronald L. Mindek, pro se.

Ben Mindek, pro se.

Roger J. Ecker, Barbara A. Rizzo, Peacock, Keller, Yohe, Day & Ecker, Washington, Pa., for appellees Rigatti, Purdy, Dorsey, Secreet, and Borough of McDonald.

Peter J. Taylor, Murphy, Taylor & Trout, Pittsburgh, Pa., for appellee Barbour.

A. Taylor Williams, Supreme Court of Pennsylvania Administrative Office of Pa. Courts, Philadelphia, Pa., for appellees Lilley and Pozonsky.

Melvin B. Bassi, Bassi & Rega, Charleroi, Pa., for appellees Pettit and Fagella.

Before: BECKER, ALITO, and GARTH, Circuit Judges.

Submitted Under Third Circuit Rule 12(6) on May 1, 1992.

OPINION OF THE COURT

GARTH, Circuit Judge:

For the second time in four years, and after the labors of a federal magistrate judge, two district court judges and four panels of this Court, we must once again consider the case of two plaintiffs who, virtually from the commencement of their suit four years ago, have continually flouted court orders and denigrated the authority of the magistrate...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases