HEMSTREET v. COMPUTER ENTRY SYSTEMS CORP.

No. 90-1436.

972 F.2d 1290 (1992)

Harold S. HEMSTREET, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COMPUTER ENTRY SYSTEMS CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Rehearing Denied; Suggestion for Rehearing Declined September 29, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Leonard M. Ring, Leonard M. Ring & Associates, Chicago, Ill., argued, for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief were James M. Wetzel, James M. Wetzel, P.C., associated with Burditt, Bowles & Radzius, Chtd., and Edward D. Manzo, Cook, Egan, McFarron & Manzo, Ltd., of Chicago, Ill.

Thomas L. Crisman, Johnson & Gibbs, P.C., Dallas, Tex., argued, for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief were Gaynell C. Methvin and James D. Petruzzi.

Before MICHEL, Circuit Judge, SMITH, Senior Circuit Judge, and PLAGER, Circuit Judge.


Rehearing Denied; Suggestion for Rehearing In Banc Declined September 29, 1992.

PLAGER, Circuit Judge.

Appellant Harold S. Hemstreet (Hemstreet) appeals the order of the District Court for the Northern District of Illinois entering summary judgment in favor of defendant Computer Entry Systems Corp. (CES). Hemstreet v. Computer Entry Systems Corp., 741 F.Supp. 1308, 16 USPQ2d 1204 (N.D.Ill.1990). The trial court...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases