1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 964 F.2d
  5. 964 F.2d 1122 (1992)
 

IN RE SCHOENWALD

No. 91-1421.

964 F.2d 1122 (1992)

In re Ronald D. SCHOENWALD and Charles F. Barfknecht.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

May 12, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edmund J. Sease, Zarley, McKee, Thomte, Voorhees & Sease, Des Moines, Iowa, argued, for appellant.

Fred E. McKelvey, Sol., Office of the Sol., Arlington, Va., argued, for appellee. With him on the brief were Richard E. Schafer, Associate Sol. and Joseph G. Piccolo, Asst. Sol.

Before NEWMAN, ARCHER, and MAYER, Circuit Judges.

MAYER, Circuit Judge.

Ronald D. Schoenwald and Charles F. Barfknecht appeal from a decision of the Patent and Trademark Office Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences which affirmed the rejection of Claim 9 of Patent Application No. 257,826 for anticipation. Appeal No. 89-3349 (Dec. 17, 1990). We affirm.

Background

The application was filed on October 14, 1988, and claimed compounds which are used in ophthalmic compositions to treat dry...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases