LARISCEY v. U.S.

No. 90-5129.

962 F.2d 1047 (1992)

Earl Jason LARISCEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

April 30, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John S. Moot, argued (Buel White and Lewis B. Gardner, on brief), Verner, Liipfert, Bernhard, McPherson & Hand, Chartered, Washington, D.C., for plaintiff-appellant.

Peter Mark Poulos, argued (Stuart M. Gerson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Vito J. DiPietro and Chun-I-Chiang, Attorneys, on brief), Commercial Litigation Branch, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., for defendant-appellee.


ORDER

A suggestion for rehearing in banc having been filed in this case,

UPON CONSIDERATION THEREOF, it is

ORDERED that the suggestion for rehearing in banc be, and the same hereby is accepted. The judgment entered on November 15, 1991, 949 F.2d 1137, is VACATED, and the accompanying opinion is withdrawn. The mandate issued on January 15, 1992 is RECALLED.

Additional...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases