John L. TOYE, d/b/a Secretary Services
v.
TELEPHONE SERVICERS, et al. consolidated with
Robert H. BOH and Louis M. Freeman, et al.
v.
WILLOW CORPORATION, et al.
Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
January 30, 1992.
Rehearings Denied March 18, 1992.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Wiley G. Lastrapes, Jr., Chaffe, McCall, Phillips, Toler & Sarpy, New Orleans, for plaintiffs-appellees Administrators of Tulane Educational Fund, Robert H. Boh and Louis M. Freeman, as trustees of Lester Sobin Unitrust.
William H. Reinhardt, William M. McGoey, Post, Reinhardt & McGoey, Metairie, for defendants-appellees Tel. Servicers and Teleservices Corp.
Leon H. Rittenberg, Jr., Polack, Rosenberg, Rittenberg, & Endom, New Orleans, for defendants-appellees Norman Galen and Richard D. Palmer.
Gerald J. Talbot, Lemle, Kelleher, Kohlmeyer, Dennery, Hunley, Moss & Frilot, New Orleans, for defendants-appellees John O. White and D.J. Mitchell.
R. Justin Garon, Garon, Brener & McNeely, New Orleans, for defendants-appellees Max Sugar, Bernard Tumarkin and Ethel Tumarkin.
Charles G. Merritt, New Orleans, for defendants-appellees Earl S. Robinson, Jr., Otello M. Simoncioni, Jr. and George A. Sorensen, Jr.
John J. Weiler, Guarisco, Weiler & Cordes, New Orleans, in pro. per.
Paul S. Hughes, John F. Willis, Deutsch, Kerrigan & Stiles, New Orleans, for defendant-appellant John L. Toye.
Before KLEES and WARD, JJ., and GULOTTA, J. Pro Tem.
Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit.
KLEES, Judge.
Defendants appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiffs, the Administrators of the Tulane Educational Fund and Robert H. Boh and Louis M. Freeman as Trustees of the Lester Sobin Unitrust [hereinafter collectively referred to as "Tulane"]. Defendants include the maker and various endorsers and assumers of a defaulted promissory note held by Tulane. In the court below, Tulane obtained a judgment on the note, as well as a judgment for the amount of certain...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.