LUSARDI v. XEROX CORP.

Nos. 91-5846, 91-5890.

975 F.2d 964 (1992)

Jules LUSARDI; Walter N. Hill; James Marr, Jr.; and John F. Weiss, individually, and on behalf of all other persons similarly situated; Arthur Brickman; Martin J. Cocca; Carl B. Heisler; Raymond C. Loyer; Donald P. Miller; Robert C. Patterson; Anthony T. Salvatore; Eldon Sheldon; Michael Sylvestri, individually, and on behalf of all other persons similarly situated v. XEROX CORPORATION, A New York Corporation, Jules Lusardi, Walter N. Hill, James Marr, Jr., John F. Weiss, Arthur Brickman, Martin J. Cocca, Carl B. Heisler, Raymond C. Loyer, Donald P. Miller, Robert C. Patterson, Anthony T. Salvatore, Eldon Sheldon, Michael Sylvestri, Bruce A. Blackie, Richard Vinson, Edward Brough, and Charles L. Meador, Appellants No. 91-5846. Jules LUSARDI; Walter N. Hill; James Marr, Jr.; and John F. Weiss, individually, and on behalf of all other persons similarly situated; Arthur Brickman; Martin J. Cocca; Carl B. Heisler; Raymond C. Loyer; Donald P. Miller; Robert C. Patterson; Anthony T. Salvatore; Eldon Sheldon; Michael Sylvestri, individually, and on behalf of all other persons similarly situated v. XEROX CORPORATION, A New York Corporation, Appellant No. 91-5890.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Decided September 16, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert L. Deitz (argued), Perkins Coie, Washington, D.C., Robert H. Jaffe, Jaffe & Schlesinger, Springfield, N.J., Alan S. Weitz, Ginsburg, Feldman & Bress, Washington, D.C., for appellants cross appellees.

Carmine A. Iannaccone (argued), Hannoch Weisman, Roseland, N.J., for appellee cross appellant.

Before: GREENBERG and NYGAARD, Circuit Judges and POLLAK, District Judge.


OPINION OF THE COURT

LOUIS H. POLLAK, District Judge.

This appeal presents the question whether a trial court has jurisdiction to entertain a motion for class certification brought by putative class representatives who have previously settled their individual claims. The district court decided that there was no longer a live "case or controversy" and dismissed the class certification motion as moot. Because we conclude that the district court correctly determined...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases