1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 975 F.2d
  5. 975 F.2d 815 (1992)
 

BRAUN INC. v. DYNAMICS CORP. OF AMERICA

Nos. 91-1329, 91-1363.

975 F.2d 815 (1992)

BRAUN INC. and Braun Aktiengesellschaft, Plaintiffs/Cross-Appellants, v. DYNAMICS CORPORATION OF AMERICA, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Suggestion for Rehearing Declined October 7, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Steven E. Lipman, Fish & Richardson, Washington, D.C., argued for plaintiffs/cross-appellants. With him on the brief was Heidi E. Harvey, Fish & Richardson, of Boston, Mass.

Harry C. Marcus, Morgan & Finnegan, New York City, argued for defendant-appellant. With him on the brief were Thomas P. Dowling and Mark J. Abate, of counsel.

Before: RICH and PLAGER, Circuit Judges, and COHN, District Judge.

Suggestion for Rehearing In Banc Declined October 7, 1992.

COHN, District Judge.

I. Introduction

This is, among other things, a design patent infringement case. Plaintiffs/cross-appellants, Braun, Inc., and Braun Aktiengesellschaft (Braun), are the owners of U.S. design patent No. 271,176, which relates to a hand held electric blender. Defendant-appellant, Dynamics Corporation of America's Waring Products Division (Waring), manufactures a competing...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases