COLGATE-PALMOLIVE CO. v. FRANCHISE TAX BD.

Docket No. C007044.

10 Cal.App.4th 1768 (1992)

13 Cal. Rptr.2d 761

COLGATE-PALMOLIVE COMPANY, INC., Plaintiff and Respondent, v. FRANCHISE TAX BOARD, Defendant and Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, Third District.

November 20, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

John K. Van de Kamp and Daniel E. Lungren, Attorneys General, Robert F. Tyler and John D. Schell, Deputy Attorneys General, and Eric J. Coffill for Defendant and Appellant.

Morrison & Foerster, Franklin C. Latcham, James P. Kleier and Clare M. Rathbone for Plaintiff and Respondent.


OPINION

DAVIS, J.

The principal issue in this appeal is whether California's worldwide unitary method of taxation (based on Rev. & Tax. Code, §§ 25101, 25120-25139), as applied to domestic-parent unitary corporate groups, is unconstitutional under the foreign commerce clause of the United States Constitution. (U.S. Const., art. I, § 8, cl. 3.)1 Using the dormant foreign commerce clause...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases