THOMPSON v. REUTING

Nos. 91-1690, 91-1752.

968 F.2d 756 (1992)

Kenneth N. THOMPSON, Appellant, v. James R. REUTING (Police Officer), Appellee, Edward Hale, Police Officer; Steve Cordwin, Police Officer, Omaha Police Division. Kenneth N. THOMPSON, Appellant, v. Edward HALE (Police Officer); Steve Cordwin (Police Officer), Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Decided July 7, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Francis T. Belsky and Terrance S. Dewald, Omaha, Neb., on the brief, for Kenneth N. Thompson.

Herbert M. Fitle, James E. Fellows and Wendy E. Hahn, Omaha, Neb., on the briefs, for appellees.

Before LAY, Chief Judge, RICHARD S. ARNOLD, Circuit Judge, and STUART, Senior District Judge.


RICHARD S. ARNOLD, Circuit Judge.

These appeals involve two separate actions brought by Kenneth N. Thompson under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claiming that Omaha police officers violated his Fourth and Fourteenth Amendment rights. In No. 91-1752NE, Thompson claims the District Court erred in denying his motions for partial summary judgment, a directed verdict, and judgment notwithstanding the verdict or a new trial after a jury found in favor of the defendants on his claim...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases