No. 89-1562.

971 F.2d 736 (1992)

PLANNING RESEARCH CORPORATION, Appellant, v. The UNITED STATES, Appellee, and Electronic Data Systems Federal Corporation, Intervenor.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

August 5, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Herbert L. Fenster, McKenna, Conner & Cuneo, of Washington, D.C., argued for appellant. With him on the brief were Lawrence M. Farrell and Susan F. Heck.

John S. Groat, Attorney, Commercial Litigation Branch, Dept. of Justice, of Washington, D.C., argued for appellee. With him on the brief were Stuart M. Gerson, Asst. Atty. Gen., David M. Cohen, Director and Thomas W. Petersen, Asst. Director. Also on the brief were Thomas West and Prentis Cook, Dept. of Energy, of counsel. Ronald K. Henry, Baker & Botts, of Washington, D.C., argued for intervenor. With him on the brief was Stephen L. Teichler.

Before NIES, Chief Judge, ARCHER, Circuit Judge, and KELLEHER, District Judge.

ARCHER, Circuit Judge.

Planning Research Corporation (PRC) appeals the decision of the General Services Board of Contract Appeals (board) which sustained the protest filed by Electronic Data Systems Federal Corporation (EDS) to the contract awarded to PRC by the Energy Information Administration (EIA), United States Department of Energy, 89-2 BCA ¶ 21,655. EDS intervened and urges on appeal that the board's decision be affirmed. The United States has contested...

Let's get started

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases