1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 954 F.2d
  5. 954 F.2d 679 (1992)
 

ROBBINS v. DAY

No. 91-7332.

954 F.2d 679 (1992)

Irene ROBBINS and Bert Shepherd, a/k/a Trustees of the Davis Robbins Family Trust, a/k/a Trustees of the Davis Robbins Marital Trust, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. John DAY, PaineWebber Incorporated, Jerry Payne, Defendants-Appellants. PAINEWEBBER INCORPORATED, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Irene ROBBINS and Bert Shepherd a/k/a Trustees of the Davis Robbins Family Trust, a/k/a Trustees of the Davis Robbins Marital Trust, Defendants-Appellees. Irene ROBBINS and Bert Shepherd a/k/a Trustees of the Davis Robbins Family Trust, a/k/a Trustees of the Davis Robbins Marital Trust, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. David L. ARNOLD, W. David East, Defendants-Appellants, Owen Vickers, Harvey Gotleib, Alabama Grease Products Company, Birmingham Hide and Tallow Company, Defendants. William E. Richardson, et al., Unknown.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

February 27, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

N. Lee Cooper, A. Inge Selden, III, Luther Dorr, Jr., Maynard, Cooper, Frierson & Gale, Birmingham, Ala., for PaineWebber.

Robert R. Baugh, F. Timothy McAbee, Sirote & Permutt, Birmingham, Ala., for Day.

J. Mark White, White, Dunn & Booker, Birmingham, Ala., for Jerry Payne.

John P. Scott, Balch & Bingham, Birmingham, Ala., for Arnold.

Lee H. Zell, Berkowitz, Lefkovits, Isom & Kushner, Birmingham, Ala., for East.

Paul A. Liles, Richard F. Ogle, Schoel, Ogle, Benton, Gentle & Centeno, Birmingham, Ala., for Vickers, et al.

Robert B. Eubank, Birmingham, Ala., for Irene Robbins and Bert Shepherd.

Before COX and DUBINA, Circuit Judges, and BROWN, Senior District Judge.

DUBINA, Circuit Judge:

Appellants PaineWebber Incorporated ("PaineWebber"), John Day, Jerry Payne, David Arnold, David East, et. al. (individually referred to by name or collectively as the "Brokers"), appeal the district court's order vacating an arbitration award and restoring the case on the district court's docket, 761 F.Supp. 773. For the reasons which follow, we reverse.

I. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

In November...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases